CHAPTER 02

If Fascists Won

What would the world look like if the Nazis had won? Not speculation — evidence. Plans, policies, and what they actually did when they had power. The fascist ideal, unchecked.

IDEAS
EVIDENCE
PEOPLE
FORCES
Part I
Why This Question Matters
The present-day stakes of counterfactual history
⚠️
Democracy-Scepticism Is in the Air
Some now argue strong leaders are better than messy democracy. Understanding the endpoint matters.

Democracy, in its current form, is under pressure. Some on the right see authoritarianism as the only alternative — a strongman who can cut through checks and balances.

This means minimising the worst moments of authoritarianism. The Holocaust has been Hollywoodised. The propaganda and tyranny of fascism have become the primary legitimising myth for liberal democracy. It is an absolute taboo to describe anything about the Nazis as good.

Hitler is the ultimate strongman. He is the end of that road. The thick end of the wedge. He is the shibboleth for what happens when one man has too much power. The root of authoritarian is author — a person who can author the story, without guard rails, totally — totalitarianism.
  • David Irving: Holocaust denier and critic of parliamentary politics
  • Curtis Yarvin (close to the US Vice-President): argues for a monarch-CEO
  • The conceptual chain: democracy → authoritarianism → fascism
  • Counterfactual history helps us see fascism's aspirations, not just its reality
🔮
The Value of "What If?"
Counterfactual history isn't speculation — it reveals the fascist ideal unchecked.

"What if?" questions — counterfactual or allohistory — help us assess whether the right choices were made. They are a type of imaginative logic. They help construct a picture of ur-fascism — the Platonic Idea of fascism, what it would look like unchecked.

Of history we can ask two questions — what happened and what might have happened?
  • Nazi apologists claim Hitler just wanted a "small sphere of influence"
  • The evidence points to global struggle in both ideology and practice
  • Counterfactuals are limited — you can't predict chain reactions — but you can take an educated guess
Part II
The Ideology of Perpetual Struggle
Mussolini, Hitler, and the Darwinian drive that never stops
🎭
Mussolini: Pragmatist of Struggle
"Darwin weighed more heavily on his mind than Marx." Struggle as the fundamental law of the universe.
BM
Benito Mussolini
More pragmatist than ideologue — but the ideology of struggle ran deep.

Mussolini saw the Mediterranean as a new Rome — the historic "living space" of Italy. He borrowed the concept of Volk from Germany, declaring in 1936 that "a people cannot live without space."

The "will to dominate" was the fundamental law of the life of the universe from its most rudimentary forms to its most elevated ones.— Mussolini, after WWI
Struggle lies at the origin of everything because life is full of contrasts. There is love and hatred, white and black, day and night, good and evil.— Mussolini (cited in Sternhell, The Birth of Fascist Ideology)
  • Goal: transform "a gesticulating, chattering, superficial country" into a nation of warriors
  • By 1930: "In Europe, Nietzsche's will to power was only represented by fascism"
  • Italian fascism was increasingly influenced by the Nazis over time
  • 20,000 Italian colonists resettled in Libya in 1938; millions planned for Ethiopia
🌍
Hitler's Stages of Domination
Continental then global. Historians debate limits, but the ideology pointed to endless expansion.

Since the 1960s, historians split into two schools: continental (Hitler's goals limited to Europe) and global (world domination). The evidence is ambiguous — but the ideology of perpetual struggle points one way.

This principle of selection that takes place through perpetual struggle is the guarantor of the success of our movement.— Adolf Hitler (cited in Kershaw, Hitler)

Historian Andreas Hillgruber argued for a multi-stage plan:

  • Stage 1: Europe to the Urals — defeat Russia and France
  • Stage 2: Middle East — launchpad to British India; seize colonies
  • Stage 3: Build Atlantic fleet, occupy West African coast
  • Stage 4: Final confrontation with the United States for global domination
A state which, in times of contaminated races, commits itself to the care of the noblest elements of its race will become lord over the entire Earth one day.— Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, penultimate sentence
IK
Ian Kershaw
Historian. Agrees: it was leading towards a final confrontation with the US. (Hitler)
⚡ QUICK CHECK

The keyword in Hitler's ideology, which points toward endless expansion, is:

A Efficiency
B Perpetual — ongoing, indefinite, forever
C Diplomacy
Exactly. "Perpetual struggle" — not a finite goal but an endless Darwinian competition between races. This is what makes the "he'd have stopped at Poland" argument so implausible.
The keyword is "perpetual." Hitler's ideology was built on endless Darwinian struggle — not a finite goal but a permanent state of racial competition.
Part III
Lebensraum in Action
What the Nazis actually did when they had power in the East
🗺️
Slavs as "Sub-Humans"
Ratzel's Lebensraum + Hitler's racial hierarchy = a plan to ethnically cleanse Eastern Europe.

Ratzel theorised that nations needed "living space." Haushofer added that agricultural cultivation was a nation's proper life. Hitler added race: Slavs were biologically inferior "sub-humans" who "generally lack state-forming powers."

Do not consider the Reich as secured so long as it does not provide a piece of land for centuries ahead for every offspring of our Nation. The most holy right on this earth is the right for land which one may cultivate himself.— Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
  • Nazi ambitions extended to the Ural Mountains — 2000 miles eastward
  • An SS document called Eastern Europe "a paradise, a California of Europe"
  • Generalplan Ost: transfer 31 million Poles and Russians, enslave 14 million others
  • Not a traditional empire — a racial empire. Hitler saw the British Empire as obsolete because it allowed racial mixing
💀
Eliminating the Intelligentsia
100,000 Polish priests, judges, journalists murdered. Universities raided. Knowledge itself was the target.

In Poland (1939): ~100,000 members of the intelligentsia — priests, businessmen, judges, journalists — murdered by the Einsatzgruppen in Intelligenzaktion. Many killed by public firing squad to terrorise the population.

At the University of Krakow, after the faculty was gathered for a lecture on Nazi ideology, the auditorium was surrounded by SS troopers and all inside were arrested and sent to a concentration camp, where almost all died.— Winstone, The Dark Heart of Hitler's Europe
  • In Kyiv, targets included "bearers of political ideas," "undesirable elements," "asocial elements"
  • In Soviet territories, Einsatzgruppen followed the Wehrmacht's advance
  • Writers, journalists, artists, Soviet bureaucrats targeted systematically
📚
Engineered Ignorance
Himmler: Slavic children should learn "simple arithmetic up to 500 at the most" and obedience.

In annexed Poland, all Polish-language schools were closed. Children got 4 years of education, in German. In Ukraine and Belarus, most schools shut, universities restricted. Equipment destroyed or shipped to Germany.

Simple arithmetic up to 500 at the most; writing of one's name; a doctrine that it is a divine law to obey the Germans and to be honest, industrious and good. I don't think that reading should be required.— Heinrich Himmler, on Slavic education (Kamenetsky, Secret Nazi Plans for Eastern Europe)
  • Hitler: Slavic education should give just enough German to take orders
  • Museum pieces stolen, library books used as fuel, artworks thrown through windows
  • Historical buildings systematically demolished "with typical German precision"
🍞
Starvation, Disease & Terror
"Superfluous eaters." Roadblocks prevented food reaching cities. POWs deliberately starved.

Disease outbreaks left to spread. Medical treatment deliberately withheld. Syphilis sufferers in Ukraine taken to Mariupol hospital and executed. Abortion and contraception encouraged in Poland to reduce the Slavic birthrate.

"Superfluous eaters" — roadblocks were set up to prevent food getting to cities. The same infrastructure was being used to transport food to Germany.— German Economic Armament Staff, 1941 (cited in Mazower, Hitler's Empire)
  • Soviet POWs deliberately starved; camp commanders refused donated food
  • "Collective responsibility retaliations": for one German killed, 50–100 civilians executed
  • Anin, Poland (Dec 1939): 114 people executed after 2 German personnel killed
  • Hans Frank admitted "in most cases these actions were not directed against those who are guilty"
🏗️
The Slavic Presence Was Temporary
"The Slavs are to work for us. In so far as we do not need them, they may die." — Martin Bormann

Even slavery was undesirable — German racial homogeneity was essential. Only by working the soil themselves could Germans realise their biological superiority. Slavic manpower was temporary — after victory, they would be "cast aside."

The Slavs are to work for us. In so far as we do not need them, they may die.— Martin Bormann, Hitler's private secretary (cited in Kamenetsky, Secret Nazi Plans for Eastern Europe)
Many would have died from this de facto policy of "extermination through work," but even more would have perished in what Giordano called "the other Holocaust" — the genocide of the Slavs.— Gavriel Rosenfeld, The World Hitler Never Made
  • Deportation was insufficient — Slavs in Siberia might threaten the Reich later
  • Complete extermination was "more than mere possibility"
  • An SS officer's PhD research in Libya informed settlement policy in the East
⚡ QUICK CHECK

Why did the Nazis view even Slavic slavery as undesirable long-term?

A It was too expensive
B German racial homogeneity required Germans to work the soil themselves — contact with "inferior" races was contaminating
C International pressure made it politically untenable
Right. The ideology demanded that Germans connect to the soil directly. Slavic labour was a wartime necessity, not a goal. Racial purity required elimination, not subjugation.
It wasn't about cost or politics. The ideology demanded racial homogeneity — Germans had to work the soil themselves to realise their biological "superiority." The Slavic presence was always meant to be temporary.
Part IV
What About Britain & America?
Racial cousins, mongrelised enemies, and the final confrontation
🇬🇧
Britain: "Racial Cousins"
Hitler wanted Britain as an ally. But perpetual struggle meant even allies were eventually rivals.

In Mein Kampf, Hitler saw Britain and Italy as foundational allies. British Aryans were already spread worldwide — obvious partners in expanding the Aryan race.

Should the British Empire be destroyed, a vacuum would be created that could not be filled.— Adolf Hitler, 1940 (cited in Rosenfeld, The World Hitler Never Made)
Despite the brutality of his designs, Hitler expected to find indispensable allies. The most important would be the British Empire, which he proposed to support in exchange for a free hand on the Continent.— Stanley Payne, A History of Fascism
  • But France — also Aryan — was deemed "too corrupted" by colonial racial mixing
  • Hitler was "irrational enough to twist the logic of the ideology to suit his needs"
  • Once Britain rejected peace talks, occupation became inevitable
  • Short-term ally, long-term rival — the logic of perpetual struggle
🇺🇸
America: The Final Struggle
60 million Germanic Americans — but also "headquarters of world Jewry." The ultimate confrontation.

Hitler was torn. 60 million Americans of Germanic origin. America's westward expansion was an "Aryan Germanic striving." But Jewish and African racial mixing made America unredeemable — the "headquarters of world Jewry."

In future the only state that will be able to stand up to North America will be the one which has understood how to raise the value of its people in racial terms.— Adolf Hitler, Zweites Buch (Second Book)
America's enormous competitive advantage in industrial technology was above all a function of the size of America's internal market. Fordism, in other words, required Lebensraum.— Adam Tooze, The Wages of Destruction
  • America necessitated German expansion eastward — to match US industrial scale
  • Jan 1941: after conquering the East, Germany would be ready for a "war against continents"
  • Plans: occupy West Africa, Canary Islands, Azores as launchpads
  • The Messerschmitt Me 264 — a bomber to reach the US — failed due to lack of materials
🏙️
Poznan: A Preview
In just 3 months, a Polish city was transformed into a "typical German community." A window into the future.
The city with the finest historical tradition in all Poland was now, to all appearances, a typical German community. Every sign was in German. The street names were in German. If a German passed by, a Pole had to step off the sidewalk. A Pole could not travel by automobile or trolley and was even forbidden to own a bicycle.— Polish Underground courier, December 1939 (cited in Winstone, The Dark Heart of Hitler's Europe)
The Führer's verdict on the Poles is damning. More like animals than human beings, completely primitive, stupid and amorphous.— Joseph Goebbels, diary (cited in Kershaw, Hitler)

Poznan was transformed in three months. This was not a distant plan — it was already happening. The fascist ideal was not hypothetical; it was being built in real time.

⚡ QUICK CHECK

Why did Hitler see America as both admirable and an ultimate enemy?

A America's military was the strongest in the world
B 60 million Germanic Americans and a model continental empire — but "corrupted" by Jewish and African racial mixing
C America had rejected a formal alliance offer
Right. Hitler admired America's Germanic settlers and continental expansion but considered it racially "mongrelised" and the "headquarters of world Jewry" — making it the ultimate rival.
It was racial, not military or diplomatic. Hitler admired America's Germanic heritage and continental scale but considered it fatally corrupted by racial mixing — making it the ultimate future enemy.
Part V
The Soul of Fascism, Unchecked
What the evidence tells us about fascism's fundamental drive
♾️
An Enemy Is Always Required
Social Darwinist struggle is zero-sum. The ideology always needs a foil — Jews first, then Slavs, then...
The mass enthusiasm which over half a century of Volkish agitation had made explosive was shifted away from the real social and economic grievances and channeled into anti-Semitism.— George Mosse, The Crisis of German Ideology

There is a dynamism to it. An enemy is always required and always selected. Jews as the inner enemy came first. Then Slavs. Then "corrupted" Aryans. Then America. The logic of perpetual struggle has no natural endpoint.

  • The Holocaust was not the end — it was the first stage
  • Generalplan Ost: the "other Holocaust" — the genocide of the Slavs
  • Even "racial cousins" like France and Britain were ultimately rivals
  • There is no finish line in perpetual struggle
🏛️
Not a Traditional Empire
A racial empire — contiguous, homogeneous, modelled on America's westward expansion, not Britain's colonies.

Hitler saw the British Empire as obsolete because it allowed racial mixing across geography. The Nazi vision was different: a contiguous racial empire, like the United States' westward expansion — settle, displace, replace.

  • Italy, Japan, and Germany would represent a new type of Empire — racial, not colonial
  • Mussolini planned large-scale population transfers, not colonial bureaucracies
  • Japan's "Millions to Manchuria" plan: 20% of farmers settled over two decades
  • The model was the American frontier — but with explicit racial extermination
⚖️
Why This Is Normative
"History is normative. You can approach it with moral questions in mind." What makes this undesirable?

The question for you: what makes this undesirable? It may seem laughable. But it matters. Because history is meant to be unbiased — but you're not stupid, you can tell this isn't a history anyone should want.

History is normative. You can approach it with moral questions in mind. Those moral questions will be different for everyone. But they exist.
  • We've seen fascism in practice (Ch.1) and fascism in the ideal (Ch.2)
  • Next: existing authoritarianism today
  • Finally: bringing it together — fascism in the present
  • The conceptual chain matters: democracy → authoritarianism → fascism